As discussed in our previous post, one of the most critical tasks for Patent Owners during the Inter Partes Reviews ("IPR") discovery period is deposing the Petitioner's expert
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
I previously wrote about a Federal Circuit Opinion that affirmed
a lower court ruling that the term “half-liquid” was
indefinite despite the apparent mis-translation of the original
Italian term “semiliquido” https://www.lifesciencesipblog.com/indefiniteness-bad-translation-lack-of-definition-or-both.
On March 1, 2021, the losing party (IBSA Institut Biochimique,
S.A., Altergon, S.A., IBSA Pharma Inc.) filed a petition for writ
of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court and so I thought it would
be interesting to take another look at this case. Indeed, the
petitioner presented a novel question for review of the lower
Sueball sees social network squaring off against app upstart in UK branch of worldwide fight
Gareth Corfield Fri 16 Apr 2021 // 08:30 UTC Share
Copy
A legal battle between a company which says Facebook Live infringes one of its patents and the anti-social networking biz is currently playing out in the High Court of England and Wales as part of a long-running multinational legal battle.
Voxer, which
The Registerbriefly covered in 2011 when it launched its “walkie-talkie for the modern age”, is locked in a courtroom skirmish with Facebook over a patent for its live streaming video technology.
The case is notable because Facebook claims Voxer infringed its intellectual property and wants Voxer’s patent declared invalid. For its part, Voxer wants to alter its disputed IP, EU patent 2,393,259, and then have the High Court declare that it doesn’t infringe any of Facebook’s patents for its Live technology.
Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz
In a 56-page opinion that could substantially affect for the concept fair use in U.S. copyright law, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit overturned a district court.
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton
California Labor Code Section 925 prohibits employers from requiring employees who reside and work primarily in California, as a condition of employment, to agree to any provision .
Obhan & Associates
Trademarks Comparative Guide for the jurisdiction of India, check out our comparative guides section to compare across multiple countries
Foley & Lardner
Earlier this year, two new laws were enacted that impact patent listings in the Orange Book (drugs) and Purple Book (biologics). The Orange Book Transparency Act primarily codifies current FDA practices,.